Skip to main content
Article
Librarians and Link Rot: A Comparative Analysis with Some Methodological Considerations
UNL Libraries: Faculty Publications
  • David C. Tyler, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Beth McNeil, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
ORCID IDs

David C. Tyler

Date of this Version
10-15-2003
Comments

Published in portal: Libraries and the Academy 3:4, pp. 615-632. Copyright 2003 Johns Hopkins University Press. Used by permission.

Abstract

The longevity of printed guides to resources on the web is a topic of some concern to all librarians. This paper attempts to determine whether guides created by specialist librarians perform better than randomly assembled lists of resources (assembled solely for the purpose of web studies), commercially created guides ('Best of the web'-type publications), and guides prepared by specialists in library science and other fields. The paper also attempts to determine whether the characteristics of included web resources have an impact on guides' longevity. Lastly, the paper addresses methodological issues of concern to this and similar studies.

Citation Information
David C. Tyler and Beth McNeil. "Librarians and Link Rot: A Comparative Analysis with Some Methodological Considerations" (2003)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/beth_mcneil/6/