![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/4BUrqGjy2Z529vCR0Eov8F9p5XE=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/d6/52/5c/d6525c33-019f-4d24-bad9-4bf39df8ad8c/thumbnail_0c94105a-1075-4b83-a3f0-b9d3ca2a71d9.jpg)
Article
Mandatory ADR Notice Requirements: Gender Themes and Intentionality in Policy Discourse
Harvard Negotiation Law Review
(2016)
Abstract
A number of regulatory bodies impose a mandatory duty on lawyers to notify their clients of alternative forms of dispute resolution in connection with any engagement involving a conflict, potential lawsuit, or lawsuit. The propriety of such a requirement is subject to an on-going, and increasingly predictable, debate focused upon the scope of the duty and any exemptions therefrom and upon its intrusiveness vis-à-vis lawyer autonomy. This article reviews the relevant ethical rules and the debate inspired thereby; considers the gender-related themes present and, more importantly, absent in this debate; and raises questions about the possible pragmatic and policy-related impacts and relevance of these themes.
Disciplines
Publication Date
2016
Citation Information
Becky Jacobs. "Mandatory ADR Notice Requirements: Gender Themes and Intentionality in Policy Discourse" Harvard Negotiation Law Review Vol. 22 (2016) Available at: http://works.bepress.com/becky-jacobs/19/