Skip to main content
Postablation endometrial carcinoma
Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
  • Morris Wortman, Center for Menstrual Disorders
  • George A. Vilos, Western University
  • Angelos G. Vilos, Western University
  • Basim Abu-Rafea, Western University
  • Wendy Dwyer, University of Rochester
  • Robert Spitz
Document Type
Publication Date
URL with Digital Object Identifier

Background: Many women have undergone both resectoscopic and nonresectoscopic (or global) endometrial ablation (EA) during the past 20 years. These women are now approaching their sixth and seventh decades of life, a time frame in which endometrial carcinoma (EC) is most frequently diagnosed. Database: In several reports, surgeons have expressed concern that endometrial ablation may leave a sequestered island of EC that may escape detection, possibly delaying its diagnosis or causing it to appear at an advanced stage. Others suggest that EA artifact does not hinder the evaluation and treatment planning in the presence of EC. Data bases used are from Medline and PubMed. Discussion: We introduce 6 new cases of postablation endometrial carcinoma (PAEC), 4 of which occurred after the introduction of global endometrial ablation (GEA) techniques. In addition, we examine several key questions regarding the impact of EA on the subsequent development of EC, including the manner in which PAEC presents, the efficacy of traditional diagnostic modalities, the ablation-to-cancer interval, and the stage of PAEC at the time of diagnosis. Finally, we explore the use of reoperative hysteroscopic surgery (RHS) as a diagnostic modality and address the possible role ultrasound surveillance as a screening method for women at risk of EC.

Citation Information
Morris Wortman, George A. Vilos, Angelos G. Vilos, Basim Abu-Rafea, et al.. "Postablation endometrial carcinoma" Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons Vol. 21 Iss. 2 (2017)
Available at: