Skip to main content
Article
Effect of financial incentives on improvement in medical quality indicators for primary care
Meyers Primary Care Institute Publications and Presentations
  • Thomas F. Gavagan, Baylor College of Medicine
  • Hongyan Du, NorthShore University Health System
  • Barry G. Saver, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Gerald J. Adams, Baylor College of Medicine
  • Douglas M. Graham, Baylor College of Medicine
  • Regina McCray, Harris County Hospital District
  • G. Ken Goodrick, UTHealth Medical School
UMMS Affiliation
Meyers Primary Care Institute; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health
Date
9-9-2010
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Clinical Audit; Community Health Centers; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Physician Incentive Plans; Primary Health Care; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Reimbursement, Incentive; Retrospective Studies; Texas
Abstract

PURPOSE: The efficacy of rewarding physicians financially for preventive services is unproven. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a physician pay-for-performance program similar to the Medicare Physician Quality Reporting Initiative program on quality of preventive care in a network of community health centers.

METHODS: A retrospective review of administrative data was done to evaluate a natural quasi-experiment in a network of publicly funded primary care clinics. Physicians in 6 of 11 clinics were given a financial incentive twice the size of the current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' incentive for achieving group targets in preventive care that included cervical cancer screening, mammography, and pediatric immunization. They also received productivity incentives. Six years of performance indicators were compared between incentivized and nonincentivized clinics. We also surveyed the incentivized clinicians about their perception of the incentive program.

RESULTS: Although some performance indicators improved for all measures and all clinics, there were no clinically significant differences between clinics that had incentives and those that did not. A linear trend test approached conventional significance levels for Papanicolaou smears (P = .08) but was of very modest magnitude compared with observed nonlinear variations; there was no suggestion of a linear trend for mammography or pediatric immunizations. The survey revealed that most physicians felt the incentives were not very effective in improving quality of care.

CONCLUSION: We found no evidence for a clinically significant effect of financial incentives on performance of preventive care in these community health centers. Based on our findings and others, we believe there is great need for more research with strong research designs to determine the effects, both positive and negative, of financial incentives on clinical quality indicators in primary care.

Rights and Permissions
Citation: J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):622-31. Link to article on publisher's site
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
PubMed ID
20823357
Citation Information
Thomas F. Gavagan, Hongyan Du, Barry G. Saver, Gerald J. Adams, et al.. "Effect of financial incentives on improvement in medical quality indicators for primary care" Vol. 23 Iss. 5 (2010) ISSN: 1557-2625 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/barry_saver/5/