Skip to main content
Article
A tale of two studies: the importance of setting, subjects and context in two randomized, controlled trials of a web-based decision support for perimenopausal and postmenopausal health decisions
Meyers Primary Care Institute Publications and Presentations
  • Barry G. Saver, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • David Gustafson, University of Wisconsin
  • Thomas R. Taylor, University of Washington
  • Robert P. Hawkins, University of Wisconsin Colleges
  • Nancy F. Woods, University of Washington
  • Susan Dinauer, University of Wisconsin
  • Susan Casey, University of Washington
  • Aileen MacLaren-Loranger, University of Washington
UMMS Affiliation
Meyers Primary Care Institute; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health
Date
5-1-2007
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Aged; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Conflict (Psychology); *Decision Support Techniques; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Internet; Middle Aged; Pamphlets; Patient Education as Topic; *Patient Satisfaction; Perimenopause; Postmenopause; Questionnaires; Risk Assessment; Teaching Materials; Uncertainty; United States; Women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Knowledge relevant to women's peri- and postmenopausal health decisions has been evolving rapidly. Web-based decision supports can be rapidly updated and have the potential to improve the quality of patients' decisions. We developed and tested a web-based decision support for peri- and postmenopausal health decisionmaking. METHODS: We recruited 409 women aged 45-75 for one randomized, controlled trial and 54 women with an upcoming clinic appointment for a subsequent trial. Women were randomized to use the web-based decision support versus a printed brochure (first trial) and usual care (second trial). Outcomes were changes in decisional satisfaction, decisional conflict, and knowledge, both within each trial and compared across the trials. RESULTS: Intervention subjects had greater increases in decisional satisfaction in the second trial and knowledge in both trials. A high dropout rate among women randomized to the website in the first trial effectively negated benefits in that trial, but not in the second. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of this web-based decision support in two trials depended on a number of factors that appear related to the urgency of making a decision. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Decision aids should be targeted to patients actively trying to make a decision.
Comments

Citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2007 May;66(2):211-22. Epub 2007 Feb 20. Link to article on publisher's site

Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
PubMed ID
17317080
Citation Information
Barry G. Saver, David Gustafson, Thomas R. Taylor, Robert P. Hawkins, et al.. "A tale of two studies: the importance of setting, subjects and context in two randomized, controlled trials of a web-based decision support for perimenopausal and postmenopausal health decisions" Vol. 66 Iss. 2 (2007) ISSN: 0738-3991 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/barry_saver/26/