Skip to main content
Article
Controversy clarified: an updated review of clinical psychology and tele-health
Clinical Psychology Review
  • Jonathan G. Perle, Nova Southeastern University
  • Leah C. Langsam
  • Barry P. Nierenberg, Nova Southeastern University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-1-2011
Disciplines
Abstract/Excerpt

One of the most controversial topics in the field of clinical psychology, online tele-health, or the integration of computers and the internet with therapeutic techniques, remains at the forefront of many debates. Despite potential interest, there are numerous factors that a psychologist must consider before integrating an online tele-health intervention into their own practice. This article outlines literature pertinent to the debate. The article begins with a brief history of the use of non-face-to-face interventions as well as the earliest recorded use of "tele-health" before discussing the modern benefits and risks associated with usage. Considerations for the psychologist as well as the client are detailed; incorporating ethical implications. The authors conclude that the utilization of tele-health interventions is an exponentially expanding field that should continue to be explored. Despite many well-conceived studies, a psychologist should educate themselves in all aspects of the new modes of intervention (e.g., ethical, legal, evidence-based treatments) before attempting to implement them into everyday practice. The article ends with a discussion on the acceptance among psychologists, as well as the outlook for the future.

DOI
10.1016/j.cpr.2011.08.003
Citation Information
Jonathan G. Perle, Leah C. Langsam and Barry P. Nierenberg. "Controversy clarified: an updated review of clinical psychology and tele-health" Clinical Psychology Review Vol. 31 Iss. 8 (2011) p. 1247 - 1258 ISSN: 0272-7358
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/barry-nierenberg/28/