Anti-Inflammatory Diet for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD-AID)Senior Scholars Program
UMMS AffiliationDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
Faculty AdvisorBarbara C. Olendzki
AbstractBackground: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, which have increasingly been linked to dysbiosis, or an imbalance in the gut microbiome. Standard of care for IBD involves an often-evolving combination of anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, and immunomodulatory medications; however, the pharmacological approach is never curative, and medications routinely become ineffective for individual patients. Partially fueled by the increasing inadequacy of pharmacologic treatment regimens, there is emerging interest from patients regarding diet and its role in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases, demanding more in-depth and substantiating research from the medical community. The Anti-Inflammatory Diet for IBD (IBD-AID), which is derived and augmented from The Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD), is a nutritional regimen that restricts the intake of pro-inflammatory carbohydrates such as refined sugar, lactose, and most grains, while maximizing anti-inflammatory foods including those with prebiotic and probiotic properties. We have previous results from a case series of 11 patients with IBD showing symptomatic improvement (by Harvey Bradshaw Index scores) and downscaling of medication regimens in all 11 patients after 4 weeks on the IBD-AID. Objectives: The purpose of this small prospective study was to further assess the efficacy and feasibility of the IBD-AID intervention for the treatment of CD, and to provide pilot data for a larger application. Methods: The sample included 17 patients with biopsy-confirmed Crohn’s disease. Participants were offered the treatment diet (IBD-AID) (n=12) or standard medical care alone (control) (n=5). Patients in the IBD-AID group were required to attend one individual nutrition counseling session and three IBD-AID-specific cooking classes at the University of Massachusetts Medical School’s Shaw Building teaching kitchen. The control group continued with usual care. For all participants, demographic, clinical, and symptom data were obtained from baseline and follow-up questionnaires; dietary composition was monitored by weekly dietary recalls and food journals. All participants continued to follow with their gastroenterologists throughout the study duration. Study duration was 2 months after 70% adherence to the diet for IBD-AID participants, and 2 months after baseline for control participants. Consistent with the goals for any treatment used for CD, efficacy measures included: 1) reduction in symptomology, as measured by the validated Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI); 2) reduction in the need of immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory medications; and 3) normalizing trend in circulating inflammatory markers (i.e., CRP and ESR), albumin, and hematocrit. Feasibility measures included participant retention, dietary compliance, and participants’ self-assessments of difficulty in maintaining the diet. Results: A total of 15 enrolled patients with confirmed diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease, 5 in observation arm, 10 in intervention arm. Significant trends in dietary composition included significant increases in prebiotic and favorable dietary components, and decrease in adverse foods for the group as a whole (paired t-test values 0.0016, 0.0344, 0.0085, and 0.0014, respectively). For those patients on medication at baseline and with complete follow-up (n=9), one-third were able to decrease doses of or discontinue these medications. In addition, lab values reflected symptomatic improvements in two of our intervention patients, with changes in CRP, ESR, and hematocrit levels of -55.9 and -1.4, -30.0 and -15.0, and +5.4 and +0.3, respectively, with corresponding symptomatic improvements (HBI scores 1à7 and 8à0, respectively). No significance can be assigned, however, due to low sample size and loss to follow-up. Feasibility measures include a significant loss to follow-up rate of 33.3%, as well as an average “difficulty score” of 3.1, reflecting participants’ views on the difficult nature of “sticking with” the IBD-AID (scored on scale of 1-5, very easy to very difficult). Conclusion: Despite the study’s limitations, as well as because of them, several conclusions can be drawn. The trends noticed in the participants’ dietary component reports, and supported by participants’ self-evaluation, reveal that it is relatively easy to eliminate problem foods from the diet, but adding unfamiliar foods, particularly from the probiotic category such as plain yogurt, kimchi, miso, sauerkraut, etc., is a huge barrier to maintaining compliance. This trend may be a partial reflection of the Western food and dieting culture in which our daily meals are relatively homogenous. We are also brought up from a young age learning that “dieting” and “healthy eating” means cutting out the bad, but not necessarily bringing in the good and/or new. Despite lack of statistical significance, the two patients who exhibited normalizing lab values, in combination with their improved HBI scores, suggest the possibility of a real and meaningful benefit from IBD-AID for those able to comply with the dietary and lifestyle changes. In terms of the diet’s feasibility, the considerable loss to follow-up in this study may reflect a variety of issues, one of which may be the well-established medical and psychosocial complexity of IBD patients. This element is important for clinicians to keep in mind, and reflects the need for additional support and close follow-up when it comes to facilitating lifestyle change in this population. It also has implications for the diet itself, which should be re-examined to simplify or reframe in order to maximize generalizability and access for a greater percentage of IBD patients. Overall, this small study highlights the need for larger-scale research to draft clinical nutrition guidelines and further legitimize the utility of preventive clinical nutrition in Western medicine.
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD),
- Crohn’s disease (CD),
- ulcerative colitis (UC),
Rights and PermissionsCopyright is held by the authors, with all rights reserved.
Citation InformationAnne Barnard, Barbara C. Olendzki, Kathryn Post, Rachel Erdil, et al.. "Anti-Inflammatory Diet for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD-AID)" (2015)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/barbara_olendzki/77/