Skip to main content
Article
Comparing the Effects of Text Size and Format on the Readability of Computer-Displayed Times New Roman and Arial Text
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2003)
  • Michael L. Bernard, Wichita State University
  • Barbara S. Chaparro, Wichita State University
  • Melissa M. Mills, Wichita State University
  • Charles G. Halcomb, Wichita State University
Abstract
Times New Roman and Arial typefaces in 10- and 12-point, dot-matrix and anti-aliased format conditions were compared for readability (accuracy, reading speed, and accuracy/ reading speed), as well as perceptions of typeface legibility, sharpness, ease of reading, and general preference. In assessing readability, the 10-point anti-aliased Arial typeface was read slower than the other type conditions. Examining perceptions of typeface legibility, sharpness, and ease of reading detected significant effects for typeface, size, and format. Overall, the 12- point dot-matrix Arial typeface was preferred to the other typefaces. Recommendations for appropriate typeface combinations for computer-displayed text are discussed.
Keywords
  • human-centered computing,
  • human computer interaction,
  • interaction devices,
  • interaction design,
  • touch screens
Publication Date
December, 2003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00121-6
Citation Information
Michael L. Bernard, Barbara S. Chaparro, Melissa M. Mills and Charles G. Halcomb. "Comparing the Effects of Text Size and Format on the Readability of Computer-Displayed Times New Roman and Arial Text" International Journal of Human-Computer Studies Vol. 59 Iss. 6 (2003) p. 823 - 835 ISSN: 1071-5819
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/barbara-chaparro/47/