Skip to main content
Article
Examining Children's Reading Performance and Preference for Different Computer-Displayed Text
Behaviour & Information Technology (2002)
  • Michael L. Bernard, Wichita State University
  • Barbara S. Chaparro, Wichita State University
  • Melissa M. Mills, Wichita State University
  • Charles G. Halcomb, Wichita State University
Abstract
This study investigated how common online text affects reading performance of elementary school-age children by examining the actual and perceived readability of four computer-displayed typefaces at 12- and 14-point sizes. Twenty-seven children, ages 9 to 11, were asked to read eight children's passages and identify erroneous/substituted words while reading. Comic Sans MS, Arial and Times New Roman typefaces, regardless of size, were found to be more readable (as measured by a reading efficiency score) than Courier New. No differences in reading speed were found for any of the typeface combinations. In general, the 14-point size and the examined sans serif typefaces were perceived as being the easiest to read, fastest, most attractive, and most desirable for school-related material. In addition, participants significantly preferred Comic Sans MS and 14-point Arial to 12-point Courier. Recommendations for appropriate typeface combinations for children reading on computers are discussed.
Keywords
  • typeface preference,
  • children,
  • reading skills,
  • reading performance,
  • computer displays
Publication Date
2002
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144290210146737
Citation Information
Michael L. Bernard, Barbara S. Chaparro, Melissa M. Mills and Charles G. Halcomb. "Examining Children's Reading Performance and Preference for Different Computer-Displayed Text" Behaviour & Information Technology Vol. 21 Iss. 2 (2002) p. 87 - 96 ISSN: 0144-929X
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/barbara-chaparro/36/