Skip to main content
Article
Comparison of Final Examination Formats in a Numerical Methods Course
International Journal of Engineering Education
  • Garrick Aden-Buie, University of South Florida
  • Autar Kaw, University of South Florida
  • Ali Yalcin, University of South Florida
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2015
Keywords
  • examination formats,
  • final examination,
  • numerical methods
Abstract

With decreasing budgets for teaching assistants, large class sizes, and increased teaching loads, it is becoming ever more important to effectively utilize resources without sacrificing best practices of assessment. The objective of this study is to evaluate a hybrid multiple-choice final examination with optional partial credit (MC+PC) as a replacement for the same examination in constructed response (CR) or strict multiple-choice (MC) formats. In the hybridMC+PCformat, students were given multiple-choice options and were also allowed to submit constructed responses that would be graded for partial credit. The three examination formats were utilized once each in three offerings of a Numerical Methods course at the University of South Florida. Multiple linear regression and item analysis of student responses demonstrate that students approach the MC+PC format similarly to a CR exam, and the administrative requirements of the test were significantly reduced. This study finds the hybrid MC+PC format to be equally reliable and appropriate for a comprehensive final examination.

Citation / Publisher Attribution

International Journal of Engineering Education, v. 31, issue 1(A), p. 72-82

Citation Information
Garrick Aden-Buie, Autar Kaw and Ali Yalcin. "Comparison of Final Examination Formats in a Numerical Methods Course" International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 31 Iss. 1(A) (2015) p. 72 - 82
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/autar-kaw/66/