Skip to main content
Circularity, Naturalism, and Desire-based Reasons
Res Philosophica (2017)
  • Attila Tanyi
In this paper I propose a critique of the naturalist version of the Desire-Based Reasons Model. I first set the scene by spelling out the connection between naturalism and the Model. After this, I introduce Christine Korsgaard’s circularity argument against what she calls the instrumental principle. Since Korsgaard’s target, officially, were non-naturalist advocates of the principle, I show why and how the circularity charge can be extended to cover the naturalist Model. Once this is done, I go on to investigate in some detail the different ways of responding to the circularity challenge. I argue that none of these responses succeed, at least not without serious costs to their advocates. I then end the paper with a brief summary and some concluding remarks.
  • Christine Korsgaard,
  • reasons,
  • desires,
  • circularity,
  • ethical naturalism,
  • normative question
Publication Date
Spring 2017
Citation Information
Attila Tanyi. "Circularity, Naturalism, and Desire-based Reasons" Res Philosophica Vol. 94 Iss. 4 (2017)
Available at: