Skip to main content
Article
Trouble Counting Votes - Comparing Voting Mechanisms in the United States and Selected Other Countries
Creighton L. Rev.
  • Frank Emmert, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
  • Christopher Page, Queens University, Ontario
  • Antony Page, Florida International University College of Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2008
Disciplines
Excerpt

The primary functions of elections are to produce winners, decide who forms governments, and make the determination of winners and governments legitimate. Legitimacy requires that governments conduct elections in a way that is objectively fair and widely perceived as fair. Therefore, a central motivation for non-partisan and uniform system of election administration is "that every citizen, every voter, be treated equally and have an equal opportunity to participate." The United States frequently appears to fall short of these goals. The highest profile example of this failure is the Florida vote in the 2000 presidential election. Michigan Representative John Conyers stated, "[o]ur broken electoral system was an accomplice to a magic trick that would make David Copperfield proud: millions of Americans went to vote on November 7, 2000, only to have their voice in our democracy disappear."

Citation Information
Frank Emmert, Christopher Page and Antony Page, Trouble Counting Votes - Comparing Voting Mechanisms in the United States and Selected Other Countries, 41 Creighton L. Rev. 3, 36 (2008)