Skip to main content
Article
Spendthrift Trusts: It's Time to Codify the Compromise
Nebraska Law Review
  • Anne S. Emanuel, Georgia State University College of Law
Publication Date
1-1-1993
Abstract

I. Introduction

II. Restraints on the Alienation of Interests in Trust ... A. Spendthrift Provisions ... B. Protective, Discretionary, and Support Provisions as Alternatives

III. The Contours of the Debate ... A. Arguments Pro and Con: Proponents of Spendthrift Provisions v. The Loyal Opposition … 1. Dicta as Historical Imperative ... 2. Should Spendthrift Provisions Be Treated as Invalid Restraints on Alienation? ... 3. The Notice Argument ... 4. The Incident of Ownership Argument ... B. Where the Dust Has Settled ... 1. Claimants Likely to Prevail—the Restatement List ... 2. Pensions and Retirement Plans: The ERISA Exception

IV. Codifying the Compromise ... A. The Wheels of Justice Grind Slowly ... B. A Proposal for a Statutory Solution

V. Conclusion

Citation Information
Anne S. Emanuel. "Spendthrift Trusts: It's Time to Codify the Compromise" (1993)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/anne_emanuel/42/