Skip to main content
The Interplay Between Landscape Structure and Biotic Interactions
Current Landscape Ecology Reports
  • Phoebe Zarnetske, Michigan State University
  • Benjamin Baiser, University of Florida
  • Angela L. Strecker, Portland State University
  • Sydne Record, Michigan State University
  • Jonathan Belmaker, Tel Aviv University
  • Mao-Ning Tuanmu, Academia Sinica
Document Type
Publication Date
  • Biotic communities,
  • Species diversity,
  • Biotic communities -- Effect of landscape structure on,
  • Landscape ecology

Landscape structure and biotic interactions are closely linked. We identify five aspects of landscape structure that contribute to the co-occurrence of species and restrict or enable different types of biotic interactions: patch size and habitat amount, isolation of patches, barriers to dispersal and movement, persistence of landscape structure, and landscape complexity. In addition, these aspects of landscape structure influence the strength and outcome of biotic interactions. Whereas most research focuses on the effects of the abiotic environment on species and their biotic interactions, research on foundation species and ecosystem engineers demonstrates the important influence of biotic interactions on landscape structure itself, including effects on landscape complexity, extent of habitat, and the structure of landscape features. In this review, we describe ecological theories that lay the foundation for interplay between landscape structure and biotic interactions, and summarize these connections across an array of interacting species in freshwater, marine, and terrestrial systems. We end with suggestions for integrating the fields of landscape ecology and community ecology to better understand the connections between landscape structure and biotic interactions and better predict their dynamics in light of global change.


Copyright Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Persistent Identifier
Citation Information
Zarnetske, P.L., Baiser, B., Strecker, A. et al. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep (2017) 2: 12. doi:10.1007/s40823-017-0021-5