Impacts of Second-Generation Biofuel Feedstock Production in the Central U.S. on the Hydrologic Cycle and Global Warming Mitigation PotentialGeophysical Research Letters
Publication VersionPublished Version
AbstractBiofuel feedstocks provide a renewable energy source that can reduce fossil fuel emissions; however, if produced on a large scale they can also impact local to regional water and carbon budgets. Simulation results for 2005–2014 from a regional weather model adapted to simulate the growth of two perennial grass biofuel feedstocks suggest that replacing at least half the current annual cropland with these grasses would increase water use efficiency and drive greater rainfall downwind of perturbed grid cells, but increased evapotranspiration (ET) might switch the Mississippi River basin from having a net warm-season surplus of water (precipitation minus ET) to a net deficit. While this scenario reduces land required for biofuel feedstock production relative to current use for maize grain ethanol production, it only offsets approximately one decade of projected anthropogenic warming and increased water vapor results in greater atmospheric heat content.
RightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Copyright OwnerThe Authors
Citation InformationK. J. Harding, T. E. Twine, Andy VanLoocke, J. E. Bagley, et al.. "Impacts of Second-Generation Biofuel Feedstock Production in the Central U.S. on the Hydrologic Cycle and Global Warming Mitigation Potential" Geophysical Research Letters Vol. 43 Iss. 20 (2016) p. 10,773 - 10,781
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/andy_vanloocke/22/