Skip to main content
The Term Structure of Bond Market Liquidity and Its Implications for Expected Bond Returns
Articles and Chapters
  • Ruslan Goyenko, McGill University
  • Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, University of California - Los Angeles
  • Andrey Ukhov, Cornell University
Publication Date
Previous studies of Treasury market illiquidity span short time periods and focus on particular maturities. In contrast, we study the time series of illiquidity for different maturities over an extended period of time. We also compare time-series determinants of on-the-run and off-the-run illiquidity. Illiquidity increases and the difference between spreads of long- and short-term bonds significantly widens during recessions, suggesting a “flight to liquidity,” wherein investors shift into the more liquid short-term bonds during economic contractions. Macroeconomic variables such as inflation and federal funds rates forecast off-the-run illiquidity significantly but have only modest forecasting ability for on-the-run illiquidity. Bond returns across maturities are forecastable by off-the-run but not on-the-run bond illiquidity. Thus, off-the-run illiquidity, by reflecting macro shocks first, is the primary source of the liquidity premium in the Treasury market.

Required Publisher Statement
© Cambridge University Press. Reprint with permission. All rights reserved.

Citation Information

Goyenko, R., Subrahmanyam, A., & Ukhov, A. (2011). The term structure of bond market liquidity and its implications for expected bond returns [Electronic version]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(1), 111-139. Retrieved [insert date], from Cornell University, School of Hospitality Administration site: