Skip to main content
Article
Disease Intervention Specialist Education for the Future: An Analysis of Public Health Curricula
Public Health Reports
  • William A. Mase, Georgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health
  • Andrew Hansen, Georgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health
  • Stacy W. Smallwood, Georgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health
  • Gulzar H. Shah, Georgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health
  • Angela Peden, Georgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health
  • Ted Mulherin, Georgia Southern University
  • Kaye Bender, Public Health Accreditation Board, Alexandria, Virginia
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-10-2018
DOI
10.1177/0033354918792014
Abstract

Abstract Objectives:

The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the degree of alignment between an existing public health curricula and disease intervention specialist (DIS) workforce training needs, (2) assess the appropriateness of public health education for DISs, and (3) identify existing curriculum gaps to inform future DIS training efforts. Methods:

Using the iterative comparison analysis process of crosswalking, we compared DIS job tasks and knowledge competencies across a standard Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)-accredited bachelor of science in public health (BSPH) and master of public health (MPH) program core curricula offered by the Georgia Southern University Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health. Four researchers independently coded each DIS task and competency as addressed or not in the curriculum and then discussed all matches and non-matches between coders. Researchers consulted course instructors when necessary, and discussion between researchers continued until agreement was reached on coding. Results:

The BSPH curriculum aligned with 75% of the DIS job tasks and 42% of the DIS knowledge competencies. The MPH core curriculum aligned with 55% of the job tasks and 40% of the DIS knowledge competencies. Seven job tasks and 9 knowledge competencies were considered unique to a DIS and would require on-the-job training. Conclusions:

Findings suggest that an accrediteAbstract Objectives: The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the degree of alignment between an existing public health curricula and disease intervention specialist (DIS) workforce training needs, (2) assess the appropriateness of public health education for DISs, and (3) identify existing curriculum gaps to inform future DIS training efforts. Methods: Using the iterative comparison analysis process of crosswalking, we compared DIS job tasks and knowledge competencies across a standard Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)-accredited bachelor of science in public health (BSPH) and master of public health (MPH) program core curricula offered by the Georgia Southern University Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health. Four researchers independently coded each DIS task and competency as addressed or not in the curriculum and then discussed all matches and non-matches between coders. Researchers consulted course instructors when necessary, and discussion between researchers continued until agreement was reached on coding. Results: The BSPH curriculum aligned with 75% of the DIS job tasks and 42% of the DIS knowledge competencies. The MPH core curriculum aligned with 55% of the job tasks and 40% of the DIS knowledge competencies. Seven job tasks and 9 knowledge competencies were considered unique to a DIS and would require on-the-job training. Conclusions: Findings suggest that an accredited public health academic program, grounded in CEPH competencies, could address multiple components of DIS educational preparation. Similar analyses should be conducted at other CEPH-accredited schools and programs of public health to account for variations in curriculum.d public health academic program, grounded in CEPH competencies, could address multiple components of DIS educational preparation. Similar analyses should be conducted at other CEPH-accredited schools and programs of public health to account for variations in curriculum.

Comments

Mase WA, Hansen AR, Smallwood S, Shah GH, Peden A, Mulherin T, Bender K; Disease Intervention Specialist Education for the Future: An Analysis of Public Health Curricula, Public Health Reports (133, 6) pp. 738-748. Copyright © 2018 (SAGE Journal). 10.1177/0033354918792014.

Citation Information
William A. Mase, Andrew Hansen, Stacy W. Smallwood, Gulzar H. Shah, et al.. "Disease Intervention Specialist Education for the Future: An Analysis of Public Health Curricula" Public Health Reports Vol. 133 Iss. 6 (2018) p. 738 - 748
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/andrew_hansen/78/