Article
‘Bunkering down’: How one community is tightening social-ecological network structures in the face of global change
People and Nature
ORCID
0000-0001-9260-2153
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-22-2022
Keywords
- adaptation,
- coastal communities,
- social capital,
- social network,
- temporal exponential random graph model,
- transformation
Abstract
- Complex networks of relationships among and between people and nature (social-ecological networks) play an important role in sustainability; yet, we have limited empirical understanding of their temporal dynamics.
- We empirically examine the evolution of a social-ecological network in a common-pool resource system faced with escalating social and environmental change over the past two decades.
- We first draw on quantitative and qualitative data collected between 2002 and 2018 in a Papua New Guinean reef fishing community to provide contextual evidence regarding the extent of social and environmental change being experienced. We then develop a temporal multilevel exponential random graph model using complete social-ecological network data, collected in 2016 and 2018, to test key hypotheses regarding how fishing households have adapted their social ties in this context of change given their relationships with reef resources (i.e. social-ecological ties). Specifically, we hypothesized that households will increasingly form tight-knit, bonding social and social-ecological network structures (H1 and H3, respectively) with similar others (H2), and that they will seek out resourceful actors with specialized knowledge that can promote learning and spur innovation (H4).
- Our results depict a community that is largely ‘bunkering down’ and looking inward in response to mounting risk to resource-dependent livelihoods and a breakdown in the collaborative processes that traditionally sustained them. Community members are increasingly choosing to interact with others more like themselves (H2), with friends of friends (H1), and with those connected to interdependent ecological resources (H3)—in other words, they are showing a strong, increasing preference for forming bonding social-ecological network structures and interacting with like-minded, similar others. We did not find strong support for H4.
- Bonding network structures may decrease the risk associated with unmonitored behaviour and help to build trust, thereby increasing the probability of sustaining cooperation over time. Yet, increasing homophily and bonding ties can stifle innovation, reducing the ability to adapt to changing conditions. It can also lead to clustering, creating fault lines in the network, which can negatively impact the community's ability to mobilize and agree on/enforce social norms, which are key for managing common resources.
DOI
10.1002/pan3.10364
Additional Comments
This project was supported by the Australian Research Council through a Discovery Early Career Fellowship Grant to M.L.B. (grant no. DE190101583), the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, and the U.S. National Science Foundation (award no. 1513354 and 1620416).
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Disciplines
Citation Information
Michele L. Barnes, Lorien Jasny, Andrew Bauman, Jon Ben, et al.. "‘Bunkering down’: How one community is tightening social-ecological network structures in the face of global change" People and Nature Vol. 00 (2022) p. 1 - 17 ISSN: 2575-8314 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/andrew-bauman/13/
Summary social and ecological change data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Information files. Raw ecological network data has been deposited in Research Data JCU and can be accessed at: https://doi.org/10.25903/5ecf39990a0bb. Social network data are available upon request from the corresponding author with reasonable restrictions, as these data contain information that could compromise research participant privacy and consent.