This update on Singapore and Hong Kong laws addresses four developments, two from each jurisdiction: first, the kind of evidence which is required to rebut a presumption of resulting trust; second, the range of vitiating factors, particularly unconscionability, which allow a trust to be set aside; third, the question of what amounts to interruption of continuous adverse possession; and finally, whether abandonment of a leasehold covenant by the government is to be taken into account in assessing compensation for land resumption.