Skip to main content
Article
Rethinking Unjust Enrichment, Bailment and Necessity
Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
  • Ken TC LEE, Singapore Management University
  • Alvin Wei-Liang SEE, Singapore Management University
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
1-2011
Abstract

The Kos In The Winson , 1 the House of Lords held that salvors who took steps to prevent deterioration of salved cargo after a salvage agreement had ended had “a correlative right to charge the owner of the goods with the expenses reasonably incurred in doing so”. The * Pupil Barrister, Hong Kong. ** Lecturer in Law, Taylor’s University, Malaysia The authors would like to thank Professor Lusina Ho of HKU and Mr David Martin-Clark for their helpful comments and encouragements. All views and errors remain our own. 1. China Pacific SA v. Food Corp of India (The Winson) [1982] AC 939, 961 (Lord Diplock). See also ibid , 963 (Lord Simon of Glaisdale). CASE AND COMMENT 179

Discipline
Citation Information
Ken TC LEE and Alvin Wei-Liang SEE. "Rethinking Unjust Enrichment, Bailment and Necessity" Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly Vol. 2011 (2011) p. 178 - 184 ISSN: 0306-2945
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/alvinsee/1/