Skip to main content
Article
Physiotherapeutic rehabilitation following lumbar total disc replacement: A retrospective study
Physiotherapy Research International
  • Adeline Green, Bond University
  • Philippa Gilbert, Bond University
  • Matthew Scott-Young, Gold Coast Spine
  • Allan Abbott, Bond University
Date of this Version
4-17-2015
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Citation only

Green A., Gilbert, ., Scott-Young, M., & Abbott, A. (2015, early online) . Physiotherapeutic rehabilitation following lumbar total disc replacement: A retrospective study. Physiotherapy Research International.

Access the journal

© Copyright, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015.

2015 HERDC Submission

Abstract
Background and Purpose. This study sought to answer the following questions: What are the outcomes of physiotherapy post lumbar total disc replacement (LTDR) compared with patient self-mediated rehabilitation? Is a difference in outcomes related to the number of physiotherapy sessions? Methods. This is a retrospective observational study of 600 patients post TDR. Patient outcomes for self-mediated rehabilitation (Group 1), 1–3 sessions of clinicbased physiotherapy (Group 2) and ≥4 sessions of clinic-based physiotherapy (Group 3) were analysed. Outcomes measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), Short Form-36 Physical (SF-36 PCS) and Mental Subscale Components (SF-36 MCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain intensity. Patient’s pre-operative baseline measures and post-operative follow-up measures at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively were analysed. Results. Oswestry Disability Index and RMQ had significantly lower scores in Group 3 compared with Group 1 at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. Significantly lower scores for Group 2 compared with Group 1 were observed for the ODI at 3 months follow-up and for the RMQ at 3 and 6 months follow-up. Significantly lower scores were observed in Group 3 compared with Group 1 for VAS back pain at 3 months and VAS leg pain at 6 months follow-up. Significantly higher scores in Group 3 compared with Group 1 were also observed in the SF-36 PCS at 6, 12 and 24months. Significantly higher scores in Group 2 compared with Group 1 were observed at 6 months follow up. These trends were also observed when investigating the percentage of patients with a greater 50% improvement in the outcome measure. Conclusions. Physiotherapy post-LTDR produces statistically significant and possibly clinically important improvements in functional disability, pain and quality of life outcomes compared with self-mediated rehabilitation.
Citation Information
Adeline Green, Philippa Gilbert, Matthew Scott-Young and Allan Abbott. "Physiotherapeutic rehabilitation following lumbar total disc replacement: A retrospective study" Physiotherapy Research International (2015) ISSN: 1471-2865
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/allan_abbott/14/