Skip to main content
Other
Shedding Light on Avian Influenza H4N6 Infection in Mallards: Modes of Transmission and Implications for Surveillance
USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications
  • Kaci K. VanDalen, USDA APHIS WS National Wildlife Research Center
  • Alan B. Franklin, USDA-APHIS, Wildlife Services’ National Wildlife Research Center
  • Nicole L. Mooers, National Wildlife Research Center
  • Heather J. Sullivan, National Wildlife Research Center
  • Susan A. Shriner, USDA Wildlife Services
Date of this Version
9-1-2010
Citation

VanDalen KK, Franklin AB, Mooers NL, Sullivan HJ, Shriner SA (2010) Shedding Light on Avian Influenza H4N6 Infection in Mallards: Modes of Transmission and Implications for Surveillance. PLoS ONE 5(9): e12851. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012851

Abstract

Background: Wild mallards (Anas platyrhychos) are considered one of the primary reservoir species for avian influenza viruses (AIV). Because AIV circulating in wild birds pose an indirect threat to agriculture and human health, understanding the ecology of AIV and developing risk assessments and surveillance systems for prevention of disease is critical.

Methodology/Principal Findings: In this study, mallards were experimentally infected with an H4N6 subtype of AIV by oral inoculation or contact with an H4N6 contaminated water source. Cloacal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, fecal samples, and water samples were collected daily and tested by real-time RT-PCR (RRT-PCR) for estimation of viral shedding. Fecal samples had significantly higher virus concentrations than oropharyngeal or cloacal swabs and 6 month old ducks shed significantly more viral RNA than 3 month old ducks regardless of sample type. Use of a water source contaminated by AIV infected mallards, was sufficient to transmit virus to naïve mallards, which shed AIV at higher or similar levels as orally-inoculated ducks.

Conclusions: Bodies of water could serve as a transmission pathway for AIV in waterfowl. For AIV surveillance purposes, water samples and fecal samples appear to be excellent alternatives or additions to cloacal and oropharyngeal swabbing. Furthermore, duck age (even within hatch-year birds) may be important when interpreting viral shedding results from experimental infections or surveillance. Differential shedding among hatch-year mallards could affect prevalence estimates, modeling of AIV spread, and subsequent risk assessments.

Citation Information
Kaci K. VanDalen, Alan B. Franklin, Nicole L. Mooers, Heather J. Sullivan, et al.. "Shedding Light on Avian Influenza H4N6 Infection in Mallards: Modes of Transmission and Implications for Surveillance" (2010)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/alan_b_franklin/10/