Skip to main content
Article
A multicenter study of post-traumatic stress disorder after injury: Mechanism matters more than injury severity
Surgery
  • Juan P Herrera-Escobar, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
  • Syeda S. Al Rafai, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
  • Anupamaa J. Seshadri, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
  • Christina Weed, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
  • Michel Apoj, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
  • Alyssa Harlow, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
  • Karen Brasel, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
  • George Kasotakis, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
  • Haytham M.A. Kaafarani, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • George Velmahos, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • Ali Salim, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • Adil H. Haider, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
  • Deepika Nehra, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Publication Date
11-1-2018
Document Type
Article
Abstract

Background: Traumatic injury is strongly associated with long-term mental health disorders, but the risk factors for developing these disorders are poorly understood. We report on a multi-institutional collaboration to collect long-term patient-centered outcomes after trauma, including screening for post-traumatic stress disorder. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for the development of post-traumatic stress disorder after traumatic injury.
Methods: Adult trauma patients (aged 18-64) with moderate to severe injuries (Injury Severity Score ≥ 9) admitted to 3 level I trauma centers were screened between 6 and 12 months after injury for post-traumatic stress disorder. Patients were divided by mechanism: fall, road traffic injury, and intentional injury. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine the association between baseline patient and injury-related characteristics and the development of post-traumatic stress disorder for the overall cohort and by mechanism of injury.
Results: A total of 450 patients completed the screen. Overall 32% screened positive for post-traumatic stress disorder, but this differed significantly by mechanism, with the lowest being after a fall (25%) and highest after intentional injury (60%). Injury severity was not associated with post-traumatic stress disorder for any group, but lower educational level was associated with post-traumatic stress disorder within all the groups. Only 21% of patients who screened positive for post-traumatic stress disorder were receiving treatment at the time of the survey.
Conclusion: Post-traumatic stress disorder is common after traumatic injury, and the prevalence varies significantly by injury mechanism but is not associated with injury severity. Only a small proportion of patients who screen positive for post-traumatic stress disorder are currently receiving treatment

Comments

This work was published before the author joined Aga Khan University

Citation Information
Juan P Herrera-Escobar, Syeda S. Al Rafai, Anupamaa J. Seshadri, Christina Weed, et al.. "A multicenter study of post-traumatic stress disorder after injury: Mechanism matters more than injury severity" Surgery Vol. 164 Iss. 6 (2018) p. 1246 - 1250
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/adil_haider/79/