Skip to main content
Article
Implementing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in emergency departments: Patient and staff perspectives
LGBT health
  • Danielle German, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland
  • Lisa Kodadek, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
  • Ryan Shields, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
  • Susan Peterson, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
  • Claire Snyder, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
  • Eric Schneider, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Laura Vail, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
  • Anju Ranjit, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Maya Torain, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Adil H Haider, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
Publication Date
12-1-2016
Document Type
Article
Abstract

Purpose: To identify patient and provider perspectives concerning collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SO&GI) information in emergency departments (EDs).
Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted during the period of 2014-2015 with a diverse purposive sample of patients across the spectrum of sexual orientation and gender identities (n = 53) and ED nurses, physician assistants, physicians, and registrars (n = 38) in a major metropolitan area. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by multiple coders using constant comparative methods.
Results: Patients were willing to provide SO&GI information if collected safely and appropriately, and staff described willingness to collect SO&GI information to inform understanding of health disparities. Key themes across respondents were as follows: What will be done with the data? How will it be collected? Who will collect it? Is the environment conducive to safe disclosure? Confidentiality and potential sensitivity; standardized collection emphasizing population health; nurse intake and/or nonverbal data collection; and environmental cues and cultural competency promoting comfort for sexual and gender minorities emerged as critical considerations for effective implementation.
Conclusion: Staff and patients are amenable to SO&GI data collection in EDs, but data quality and patient and provider comfort may be compromised without attention to specific implementation considerations.

Comments

This work was published before the author joined Aga Khan University

Citation Information
Danielle German, Lisa Kodadek, Ryan Shields, Susan Peterson, et al.. "Implementing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in emergency departments: Patient and staff perspectives" LGBT health Vol. 3 Iss. 6 (2016) p. 416 - 423
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/adil_haider/302/