Skip to main content
Article
Policy mixes and their alignment over time: Patching and stretching in the oil sands reclamation regime in Alberta, Canada
Environmental Policy and Governance
  • Jeremy Rayner, University of Saskatchewan
  • Michael Howlett, Simon Fraser University
  • Adam Wellstead, Michigan Technological University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2017
Abstract

When, why and how do policy mixes change and evolve? Much of the contemporary interest in such mixes is focused on distinguishing simple policies from more complex policy mixes, evaluating the relationships between single and multiple policy tools within a mix, and developing criteria to assess the likely performance of particular mixes. These are important and necessary analytical tasks. However, another required step in understanding policy mixes is to understand how and why mixes evolve and change over time and to determine whether any changes are an improvement. In this paper, we analyse the development of a complex policy mix in the case of reclamation and remediation of the Alberta oil sands from an earlier ‘simple goal, single instrument’ policy regime to a more complex one. This case study reveals the presence of at least two dynamic processes at work in policy mix development, with significant implications for the nature of the changes that result from them.

Publisher's Statement

© 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. Publisher's version of record: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.1773

Citation Information
Jeremy Rayner, Michael Howlett and Adam Wellstead. "Policy mixes and their alignment over time: Patching and stretching in the oil sands reclamation regime in Alberta, Canada" Environmental Policy and Governance Vol. 27 Iss. 5 (2017) p. 472 - 483
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/adam-wellstead/74/