Skip to main content
Unpublished Paper
Are Retirement Planning Tools Substitutes or Complements to Financial Capability?
External Papers and Reports
  • Gopi Shah Goda, Stanford University
  • Matthew R. Levy, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Colleen Flaherty Manchester, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
  • Aaron Sojourner, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research
  • Joshua Tasoff, Claremont Graduate University
  • Jiusi Xiao, Claremont Graduate University
Upjohn Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6839-2512

Publication Date
9-6-2022
Abstract

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to understand how a web-based retirement saving calculator affects workers’ retirement-savings decisions. In both conditions, the calculator projected workers’ retirement income goal. In the treatment condition, it additionally projected retirement income based on defined-contribution savings, prominently displayed the gap between projected goal and actual retirement income, and allowed users to interactively explore how alternative, future contribution choices would affect the gap. The treatment increased average annual retirement contributions by $174 (2.3%). However, effects were larger for those with greater financial knowledge, suggesting this type of tool complements, rather than substitutes for, underlying financial capability.

DOI
10.2139/ssrn.4211243
Issue Date
September 6, 2022
Note
Upjohn project #69115
Sponsorship
U.S. Social Security Administration Grant #5-RRC08098400-10, National Bureau of Economic Research, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, and Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research
Citation Information
Goda, Gopi Shah, Matthew R. Levy, Colleen Flaherty Manchester, Aaron Sojourner, Joshua Tasoff, and Jiusi Xiao. 2022. "Are Retirement Planning Tools Substitutes or Complements to Financial Capability?"