<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Selected Works @ Widener Law</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012 Widener Law All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/widenerlaw</link>
<description>Recent documents in Selected Works @ Widener Law</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:44:17 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	



<item>
<title>Common Law and Uncommon Events: The Development of the Doctrine of Impossibility of Performance in English Contract Law</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/10</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:35 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis</author>


<category>Contracts</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Sales</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/9</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:33 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis et al.</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

<category>Sales</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>General Provisions, Sales, Bulk Transfers, and Documents of Title</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/8</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:32 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis et al.</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Revised U.C.C. Section 2-207: Analysis and Recommendations</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:31 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis et al.</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Uniform Commercial Code Annual Survey: General Provisions, Sales, Bulk Transfers, and Documents of Title</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/6</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:30 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>David Frisch et al.</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>An Appraisal of the March 1, 1990, Preliminary Report of the Uniform Commercial Code Article 2 Study Group</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/5</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:29 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis et al.</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>The Contract Formation Sections of the Proposed Revisions to UCC Article 2</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:28 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Impracticability as Risk Allocation: Changed Circumstances Upon Contract Obligations for the Sale of Goods</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:27 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>U.C.C. Article 3 Suretyship and the Holder in Due Course: Requiem for the Good Samaritan,</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:26 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code accords valuable privileges both to the holder in due course and to the surety who signs his principal's note. When the holder in due course sues the surety on the note, however, a conflict inevitably arises between these two typically innocent parties. The conflict is most acute when the surety attempts to assert a real defense of his principal against the holder in due course. In this article, Professor Wladis explores the reasons for favoring one party or the other in the context of various real defenses. The balance of policy considerations, according to Professor Wladis, weighs in favor of the holder in due course. Thus, Professor Wladis concludes that the surety should prevail only in a few situations when he can assert his own, rather than the principal's, real defense.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>U.C.C. Section 2-207: The Drafting History</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/john_wladis1/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:37:25 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John D. Wladis</author>


<category>Uniform Commercial Code</category>

</item>




</channel>
</rss>

