<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Vincent James Strickler</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/vincent_strickler</link>
<description>Recent documents in Vincent James Strickler</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:01:45 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>Green-lighting Brown: A Cumulative Process Conception of Judicial Impact</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/vincent_strickler/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/vincent_strickler/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:58:10 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Disagreement over the meaning and power of Brown v. Board of Education is part of a larger debate about the capacity of the courts to influence social change.  A "down with Brown" movement denies that the iconic case changed America.  But, an examination of 68 United States Supreme Court cases (particularly the paradigm-shifting case of Green v. County School Board) and 414 Federal District Court cases, from 1944 through 1974, reveals a cumulative-judicial process that correlates well (and better than legislative efforts) with actual desegregation successes.  Considering a "Green-lighted" Brown, rather than the historic case in isolation, better reveals the courts' true power.</description>

<author>Vincent James Strickler</author>


<category>Civil Rights</category>

<category>Constitutional Law</category>

<category>Courts</category>

<category>General Law</category>

<category>Law and Society</category>

<category>Legal History</category>

<category>Politics</category>

<category>Public Law and Legal Theory</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Green-lighting Brown: A Cumulative-Process Conception of Judicial Impact</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/vincent_strickler/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/vincent_strickler/1</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:32:49 PST</pubDate>
<description>Disagreement over the meaning and power of Brown v. Board of Education is part of a larger debate about the capacity of the courts to influence social change.  A "down with Brown" movement denies that the iconic case changed America.  But, an examination of 68 United States Supreme Court cases (particularly the paradigm-shifting case of Green v. County School Board) and 414 Federal District Court cases, from 1944 through 1974, reveals a cumulative-judicial process that correlates well (and better than legislative efforts) with actual desegregation successes.  Considering a "Green-lighted" Brown, rather than the historic case in isolation, better reveals the courts' true power.</description>

<author>Vincent James Strickler</author>


<category>Civil Rights</category>

<category>Constitutional Law</category>

<category>Courts</category>

<category>Law and Society</category>

<category>Public Law and Legal Theory</category>

</item>



</channel>
</rss>

