<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Timothy Shanahan</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/timothy_shanahan</link>
<description>Recent documents in Timothy Shanahan</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 01:33:54 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	







<item>
<title>Evolutionary Progress?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/timothy_shanahan/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/timothy_shanahan/3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:34:22 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Timothy Shanahan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Evolution Is Opportunistic, Not Directional - Response</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/timothy_shanahan/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/timothy_shanahan/2</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:34:21 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Timothy Shanahan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Evolutionary Indeterminism Thesis</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/timothy_shanahan/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/timothy_shanahan/1</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:34:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Evolutionary   indeterminists argue that, in addition to any indeterminism introduced by   quantum events, at least some evolutionary processes are themselves   fundamentally indeterministic. That is, they maintain that the chance element   in evolutionary processes results from indeterminism in the processes   themselves, rather than simply from our cognitive limitations. Not everyone   has been persuaded. A number of philosophers have argued that claims for   evolutionary indeterminism are premature at best and deeply confused at   worst. They maintain that evolutionary processes can and should be understood   as deterministic processes. According to them, "chance" is merely a   word denoting our ignorance of causes. This controversy is now one of the   liveliest topics in the philosophy of biology. This article reviews the main   arguments on each side, showing how the issues at stake in this debate raise   fundamental questions about the nature of science as an explanatory   enterprise and of the world it seeks to explain.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Timothy Shanahan</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
