Skip to main content
Article
28. Right and righteous: Children's incipient understanding of true and false statements
Journal of Cognition and Development (Published 2012) (2013)
  • Thomas D. Lyon, University of Southern California
  • Jodi A. Quas, University of California, Irvine
  • Nathalie Carrick, California State University, Fullerton
Abstract
Two studies examined young children's early understanding and evaluation of truth-telling and lying, and the role that factuality plays in their judgments. Study 1 (104 2- to 5-year-olds) found that even the youngest children reliably accepted true statements and rejected false statements, and that older children's ability to label true and false statements as "truth" and "lie" emerged in tandem with their positive evaluation of true statements and "truth" and their negative evaluation of false statements and "lie." The findings suggest that children's early preference for factuality develops into a conception of "truth" and "lie" that is linked both to factuality and moral evaluation. Study 2 (128 3- to 5-year-olds) found that, whereas young children exhibited good understanding of the association of true and false statements with "truth," "lie," "mistake," "right," and "wrong," they showed little awareness of assumptions about speaker knowledge underlying "lie" and "mistake." The results further support the primacy of factuality in children's early understanding and evaluation of truth and lies.
Keywords
  • child interviewing,
  • child testimony,
  • child abuse,
  • child maltreatment,
  • child witnesses,
  • child neglect,
  • child psychology
Publication Date
January, 2013
DOI
10.1080/15248372.2012.673187
Citation Information
28. Lyon, T. D., Quas, J. A. & Carrick, N. (2012). Right and righteous: Children's incipient understanding of true and false statements. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14, 437-454.