Skip to main content
Article
21. Children’s reasoning about disclosing adult transgressions: Effects of maltreatment, child age, and adult identity.
Child Development (2010)
  • Thomas D. Lyon, University of Southern California
  • Elizabeth C. Ahern, University of Cambridge
  • Lindsay A. Malloy, University of Cambridge
  • Jodi A. Quas, University of California, Irvine
Abstract
A total of two hundred ninety-nine 4- to 9-year-old maltreated and nonmaltreated children of comparable socioeconomic status and ethnicity judged whether children should or would disclose unspecified transgressions of adults (instigators) to other adults (recipients) in scenarios varying the identity of the instigator (stranger or parent), the identity of the recipient (parent, police, or teacher), and the severity of the transgression (‘‘something really bad’’ or ‘‘something just a little bad’’). Children endorsed more disclosure against stranger than parent instigators and less disclosure to teacher than parent and police recipients. The youngest maltreated children endorsed less disclosure than nonmaltreated children, but the opposite was true among the oldest children. Older maltreated children distinguished less than nonmaltreated children between parents and other types of instigators and recipients.
Keywords
  • child abuse,
  • neglect,
  • reasonings,
  • transgressions,
  • maltreatment,
  • child witness
Publication Date
February 26, 2010
Citation Information
Lyon, T. D., Ahern, E. A., Malloy, L. A., & Quas, J.A. (2010). Children’s reasoning about disclosing adult transgressions: Effects of maltreatment, child age, and adult identity. Child Development, 81, 1714-1728. doi ;10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01505.x