Skip to main content
Article
For Reconciliation
Journal Articles
  • Andrew W. McThenia
  • Thomas L. Shaffer, Notre Dame Law School
Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Date
1-1-1985
Publication Information
94 Yale L.J. 1661 (1985)
Abstract

The Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) movement has garnished much debate with scholars arguing on both sides—for or against—its further implementation into our adversarial system. This Article critiques the arguments against the movement focusing on Professor Owen Fiss’ work. From a theological reconciliation point of view, the Authors argue in favor of its further implementation because the ADR system promotes justice, community values, and the reconciliation of problems rather than resolution.

Comments

Reprinted with permission of Yale Law Journal.

Citation Information
Andrew W. McThenia and Thomas L. Shaffer. "For Reconciliation" (1985)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/thomas_shaffer/98/