Taking History Seriously: Textulism,Originalim, and the Ninh Amndment
Abstract
Dean William Trenor critques constitutional txtualism,contending that it pays too much attention to the words,gramma, and placement of clauses in the Constitution, and too litte to the history leding to the adoption of the interpreted language. An illusration is Amar's treatment of the Ninth Amendment in his book on the Bill of Rights. This treatment agrees that history sheds light on meaning,butcontends that the Ninth Amendent was drafted to secure right retained by granting limied power. The modern debate, moreover, is over how to intepret a postvist Constitution.
Suggested Citation
Thomas B. McAffee. 2009. "Taking History Seriously: Textulism,Originalim, and the Ninh Amndment" ExpressO
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/thomas_mcaffee/4