Skip to main content
Article
Review of Enduring Legacies: Native American Treaties and Contemporary Controversies Edited by Bruce E. Johansen
Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences (2005)
  • Taiawagi Helton, University of Oklahoma
Abstract

Even casual observers know of disputes between Natives and non-Natives over governmental authority or natural resources. In the nearly forty years since tribes gained direct access to federal courts, they have been pursuing their rights with increasing fervor. With rare exceptions, those rights are declined in a treaty. Indeed. treaties provide the foundation for the hulk or the relationship between Tribal Nations and the United States and remain a vibrant source of tribal, international, and federal law. Nevertheless only a small fraction of the general public understands the text of these documents. Interpreting treaty language requires an understanding of the historical and political circumstances surrounding a treaty's making. Too often, decision makers seek a quick fix to difficult questions. Such an oversimplified. bright-line approach virtually ensures injustice for Native people --an acceptable result only to the beneficiaries of conquest who comprise the backlash against "special rights."

Publication Date
April 1, 2005
Publisher Statement
Published in Great Plains Research Vol. 15, No. 1, 2005. Copyright © 2005 The Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Used by permission.
Citation Information
Taiawagi Helton. "Review of Enduring Legacies: Native American Treaties and Contemporary Controversies Edited by Bruce E. Johansen" Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences (2005)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/taiawagi_helton/1/