Stefan J. Padfield is an Assistant Professor of Law at The University of Akron
School of Law. His areas of expertise include corporate law and securities regulation. He
is currently teaching Basic Business Associations, Corporations, Securities Regulations,
and Mergers and Acquisitions. Professor Padfield received his B.A. from Brown University,
and J.D. from the University of Kansas School of Law. While in law school, he was a
member of both the moot court team and symposium editor for the Kansas Law Review. Prior
joining the Akron Law faculty, Professor Padfield clerked for The Hon. John R. Gibson of
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and The Hon. William E. Smith of the
U.S. District Court in Providence, R.I. Professor Padfield also worked as a corporate
attorney for Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP, in New York City. His recent scholarship
includes the articles “Is Puffery Material to Investors? Maybe We Should Ask Them,” __ U.
Pa. J. Bus. & Emp. L. __ (forthcoming), and “Who Should Do the Math? Materiality
Issues in Disclosures That Require Investors to Calculate the Bottom Line,” 34 Pepp. L.
Rev. 927 (2007).

Articles

Link

Is Puffery Material to Investors? Maybe We Should Ask Them., University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business and Employment Law (2007)
In securities litigation, the puffery doctrine stands for the proposition that vague statements of corporate...
 

PDF

Who Should Do the Math? Materiality Issues in Disclosures that Require Investors to Calculate the Bottom Line, Pepperdine Law Review (2007)
Corporations sometimes tread a fine line by disclosing the data necessary to calculate the bottom...
 

PDF

In Search of a Higher Standard: Rethinking Fiduciary Duties of Directors of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries, Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law (2004)
An important, yet undeveloped, area of corporate law concerns the fiduciary duties of wholly-owned subsidiary...
 

Link

Self-Incrimination and Acceptance of Responsibility in Prison Sex Offender Treatment Programs, University of Kansas Law Review (2001)
In this Comment, I argue that the withholding of good time credits for refusal to...
 

Contributions to Books