Shenequa L. Grey, is an Associate Professor of Law at Southern University Law Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. She teaches constitutional criminal procedure, trial advocacy, evidence, and torts. Professor Grey is a former Assistant District Attorney with jury trial experience in sex crimes and violent crimes. Her scholarship interests include constitutional criminal procedure and criminal trial practice.
General Law
“THE U. S. SUPREME COURT GETS IT RIGHT IN ARIZONA V. GANT: JUSTIFICATIONS FOR RULES PROTECT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS”, ExpressO (2009)
In Arizona v. Gant, 129 S.Ct. 1710 (2009), the United States Supreme Court recently revisited...
REVISITING THE APPLICATION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE TO THE GOOD FAITH EXCEPTIONS IN LIGHT OF HUDSON V. MICHIGAN, ExpressO (2007)
In Hudson v. Michigan, 126 S. Ct. 2159 (2006), the United States Supreme Court overruled...
Criminal Law and Procedure
“THE U. S. SUPREME COURT GETS IT RIGHT IN ARIZONA V. GANT: JUSTIFICATIONS FOR RULES PROTECT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS”, ExpressO (2009)
In Arizona v. Gant, 129 S.Ct. 1710 (2009), the United States Supreme Court recently revisited...
REVISITING THE APPLICATION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE TO THE GOOD FAITH EXCEPTIONS IN LIGHT OF HUDSON V. MICHIGAN, ExpressO (2007)
In Hudson v. Michigan, 126 S. Ct. 2159 (2006), the United States Supreme Court overruled...
Constitutional Law
“THE U. S. SUPREME COURT GETS IT RIGHT IN ARIZONA V. GANT: JUSTIFICATIONS FOR RULES PROTECT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS”, ExpressO (2009)
In Arizona v. Gant, 129 S.Ct. 1710 (2009), the United States Supreme Court recently revisited...