A1. Bibliographic Materials
A2. Legal Briefs, Motions, and Affidavits Citing My Publications (2008, 2009)
B. Corporate Law Publications (2007, 2008, and a planned 2010)
Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law (with C. Stephen Bigler), The Business Lawyer (peer reviewed) (2008)
Citation List To Gazing Into the Crystal Ball of Future Developments in Delaware Corporate Law (2007)
Gazing into the Crystal Ball of Future Developments in Delaware Corporate Law: What if the Past is not Prologue? (with R. Franklin Balotti), Corporate Governance Advisor (2007)
Corporate Governance in Mergers and Acquisitions (1621 PLI/Corp 35) (with Anne C. Foster), Mergers & Acquisitions 2007: What You Need to Know Now (2007)
C. The Federalist Papers and Constitutional Interpretation (2003 and forthcoming 2010)
The Puzzle of Hamilton's Federalist No. 77, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy (forthcoming) (2010)
Professor Jeremy D. Bailey's The Traditional View of Hamilton’s Federalist No. 77 and an Unexpected Challenge: A Response to Seth Barrett Tillman, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy (forthcoming) (2010)
The Federalist Papers as Reliable Historical Source Material for Constitutional Interpretation, West Virginia Law Review (2003)
D. ORV Clause and Nondelegation Doctrine (2005)
A Textualist Defense of Article I, Section 7, Clause 3: Why Hollingsworth v. Viriginia Was Rightly Decided, and Why INS v. Chadha Was Wrongly Reasoned, Texas Law Review (2005)
Professor Gary S. Lawson's Burning Down the House (and Senate): A Presentment Requirement for Legislative Subpoenas Under the Orders, Resolutions, and Votes Clause -- a Comment on Tillman's A Textualist Defense, Texas Law Review (2005)
The Domain of Constitutional Delegations Under the Orders, Resolutions and Votes Clause: A Reply to Professor Gary S. Lawson, Texas Law Review (2005)
Presentation: Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Orders, Resolutions and Votes Clause that Professors Edward S. Corwin and Charles L. Black, Jr. failed to ask, NYU Journal of Law and Liberty (2005)
Presentation: What James Madison could have learned from the Westminster Parliamentary Tradition, Widener Law School (2005)
Publications Calling Article I, Section 7, Clause 3 the Orders, Resolutions, and Votes Clause (2004)
E. Electoral College (2005)
Citation List to Betwixt Principle and Practice: Tara Ross's Defense of the Electoral College (2007)
Betwixt Principle and Practice: Tara Ross's Defense of the Electoral College. Reviewing: Enlightened Democracy: The Case for the Electoral College, New York University Journal of Law and Liberty (2005)
F. Continuity of Congress and Government (2006)
Professor Sanford V. Levinson's Assuring Continuity of Government -- a Comment on Tillman's Model Continuity of Congress Statute, Pierce Law Review (2006)
Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford Levinson, Pierce Law Review (2006)
Presentation: A Continuity of Congress Proposal, American Enterprise Institute (date to be determined) (2006)
G. Recess Appointments (2007)
Senate Termination of Presidential Recess Appointments, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 286 (2009); 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 82 (2007)
Professor Brian C. Kalt's Keeping Recess Appointments in Their Place -- a response to Tillman's Senate Termination of Presidential Recess Appointments, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 292 (2009); 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 88 (2007)
Terminating Presidential Recess Appointments: A Reply to Professor Brian C. Kalt, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 298 (2009); 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 94 (2007)
Professor Brian C. Kalt's Keeping Tillman Adjournments in Their Place -- A rejoinder to Tillman's Reply to Kalt, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 305 (2009); 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 108 (2007)
H. Contemporaneity in Lawmaking and the Enrolled Bill Rule (2007)
Noncontemporaneous Lawmaking: Can the 110th Senate Enact a Bill Passed By the 109th House?, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy (2007)
Professor Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl's Against Mix-And-Match Lawmaking -- a response to Tillman's Noncontemporaneous Lawmaking, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy (2007)
Defending the (Not so) Indefensible: A Reply to Professor Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy (2007)
I. Senate-Presidential Incompatibility and the Original Public Meaning of Article I, Section 6 (2008, 2009, and a planned 2009-2010)
Why Our Next President May Keep His Or Her Senate Seat: A Conjecture On The Constitution’s Incompatibility Clause, 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y 107 (2009) (only available in individualized reprints, and on LexisNexis); 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y Sidebar 1 (available on Westlaw, forthcoming on LexisNexis) (2008)
Professor Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash's Response: Why the Incompatibility Clause Applies to the Office of President, 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y 143 (2009) (only available in individualized reprints, and on LexisNexis); 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y Sidebar 35 (available on Westlaw, forthcoming on LexisNexis) (2008)
Opening Statement: Why President-Elect Obama May Keep His Senate Seat After Assuming the Presidency, U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra (2008)
Professor Steven G. Calabresi's Opening Statement: Does the Incompatibility Clause Apply to the President?, U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra (2008)
Closing Statement: An "Utterly Implausible" Interpretation of the Constitution: A Reply to Professor Steven G. Calabresi, U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra (2008)
Professor Steven G. Calabresi's Closing Statement: A Term of Art or the Artful Reading of Terms?, U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra (2008)
J. Bill of Rights Related Articles (2009 and forthcoming 2009)
Blushing Our Way Past Historical Fact And Fiction: A Response to Professor Geoffrey R. Stone’s Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture and Essay, Penn St. L. Rev. (forthcoming) (2009)
Professor Robert F. Blomquist's Beyond Historical Blushing: A Plea for Constitutional Intelligence, a Response to Tillman's "Blushing Our Way Past Historical Fact and Fiction" and "Blushing Our Way Past History", Cardozo Law Review de novo (2009)
Professor Bruce G. Peabody's Analogize This: Constitutional Interpretation, Religion, and Maintaining the Political Order, a Response to Tillman's "Blushing Our Way Past Historical Fact and Fiction" and "Blushing Our Way Past History", Cardozo Law Review de novo (forthcoming) (2009)
Professor Stephen Michael Sheppard's What Oaths Meant to the Framers' Generation: A Preliminary Sketch, a Response to Tillman's "Blushing Our Way Past Historical Fact and Fiction" and "Blushing Our Way Past History", Cardozo Law Review de novo (2009)
A Reply To My Well-Meaning Critics, Cardozo Law Review de novo (not yet drafted, planned for 2009 or 2010 publication)) (2009)
K. Constitutional Theory (planned 2009-2010 publications)
W1. The Text of the Constitution (working paper)
W2. The Stanford Trilogy (working papers)