Memorandum of Law -- Filed November 12, 2008 -- in the Delaware Court of Chancery citing Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law
Abstract
Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs 14, Noe v. Kropf, 2008 WL 4903893, 2008 DE Ch. Ct. Motions LEXIS 34 (Del. Ch. Nov. 12, 2008) (No. 4050-CC) (filed by Greenberg Traurig, LLP) is a brief which cites Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law.
[December 24, 2008]
Suggested Citation
Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs 14, Noe v. Kropf, 2008 WL 4903893, 2008 DE Ch. Ct. Motions LEXIS 34 (Del. Ch. Nov. 12, 2008) (No. 4050-CC) (citing C. Stephen Bigler & Seth Barrett Tillman, Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law, 63 Bus. Law. 1109-52 (2008)) (filed by Greenberg Traurig, LLP), available at http://works.bepress.com/seth_barrett_tillman/97/.