Seth Barrett Tillman, Links to Responses to my Publications Posted on SSRN and Elsewhere on the Internet.

Professor Gary S. Lawson, Comment, Burning Down the House (and Senate), 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1373 (2005), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=556789 ;

Professor Sanford V. Levinson, Comment, Assuring Continuity of Government, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=900607 ;

Professor Brian C. Kalt, Response, Keeping Recess Appointments in Their Place, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=959051 ;

Professor Brian C. Kalt, Keeping Tillman Adjournments in Their Place: A Rejoinder to Seth Barrett Tillman, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=962762 ;

Professor Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl, Response, Against Mix-and-Match Lawmaking, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=932574 ;

Professor Steven G. Calabresi, Rebuttal, Does the Incompatibility Clause Apply to the President?, in Seth Barrett Tillman & Steven G. Calabresi, Debate, The Great Divorce: The Current Understanding of Separation of Powers and the Original Meaning of the Incompatibility Clause, 157 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 134, 141-45 (2008), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1294671 ;

Professor Steven G. Calabresi, Closing Statement, A Term of Art or the Artful Reading of Terms?, in Seth Barrett Tillman & Steven G. Calabresi, Debate, The Great Divorce: The Current Understanding of Separation of Powers and the Original Meaning of the Incompatibility Clause, 157 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 134, 154-59 (2008), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1294671 ;

Professor Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash, Response, Why the Incompatibility Clause Applies to the Office of President, 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y 143 (2009), available at http://tinyurl.com/8bs7fqq; 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y Sidebar 35 (2008), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1557164 ;

Professor Jeremy D. Bailey, The Traditional View of Hamilton’s Federalist No. 77 and an Unexpected Challenge: A Response to Seth Barrett Tillman, 33 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 169 (2010), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1473276 ;

Professor Robert F. Blomquist, Response to Geoffrey R. Stone and Seth Barrett Tillman, Beyond Historical Blushing: A Plea for Constitutional Intelligence, 2009 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 244, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1483893 ;

Professor Steve Sheppard, Response to Geoffrey R. Stone and Seth Barrett Tillman, What Oaths Meant to the Framers' Generation: A Preliminary Sketch, 2009 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 273, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188463 ;

Professor Bruce G. Peabody, Response to Stone, Tillman, and Brownstein, Analogize This: Partial Constitutional Text, Religion, and Maintaining Our Political Order, 2010 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 204, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1537141 ;

Professor Zephyr Teachout, Rebuttal, Gifts, Offices, and Corruption, 107 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 30, 30 n.2 (2012), available at http://www.law.northwestern.edu/lawreview/colloquy/2012/9/ ;

Professor Zephyr Teachout, Closing Statement, Constitutional Purpose and the Anti-Corruption Principle, 108 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 200, 200 n.*, 201 & n.3, 202, 205 n.16, 216 (2014), http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2014/02/constitutional-purpose-and-the-anti-corruption-principle.html ;

Benjamin Cassady, “You’ve Got Your Crook, I’ve Got Mine”: Why the Disqualification Clause Doesn’t (Always) Disqualify, 32 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 209 (2014), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2447970 ;

Seth Barrett Tillman, Originalism & The Scope of the Constitution’s Disqualification Clause, 33 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 59 (2014), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2484377 (responding to Cassady) ;

....