Article
Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford Levinson
Pierce Law Review; University of New Hampshire Law Review
(2006)
Abstract
This article is published in conjunction with my Model Continuity of Congress Statute. Professor Sanford V. Levinson in a comment, appearing with the "Model," has voiced legal and prudential objections to my proposed statutory solution. This Reply responds to those objections.
My opening article appears at: Tillman, Model, 4 PIERCE LAW REVIEW 191 (2006). Professor Sanford V. Levinson comments on my Model at: Levinson, Comment, Assuring Continuity of Government, 4 PIERCE LAW REVIEW 201 (2006). I reply to his comment at: Tillman, Reply, Overruling INS v. Chadha, 4 PIERCE LAW REVIEW 207 (2006).
Since publication, Pierce Law Review has been renamed University of New Hampshire Law Review.
[October 4, 2011]
Keywords
- Continuity of Congress and Government,
- Chadha,
- Levinson,
- Burke,
- The Federalist Papers,
- ORV Clause,
- Article I Section 7 Clause 3
Disciplines
Publication Date
June 16, 2006
Citation Information
Seth Barrett Tillman, Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford Levinson,
4 Pierce L. Rev. 207 (2006); 4 U.N.H. L. Rev. 207 (2006), available at http://works.bepress.com/seth_barrett_tillman/6/,
also available at http://www.continuityofgovernment.org/proposals/seth.html, also available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=900589.