Other
Extract from Ephraim Unell, Not “The Most Powerful Argument” About the Meaning of Free Exercise: Congressional Power, “Facial” Review, and why Rosenkranz’ Subjects Theory Does Not Support Smith (2012) (unpublished manuscript), citing Tillman & Tillman's A Fragment on Shall and May
(2012)
Abstract
Extract from Ephraim Unell, Not “The Most Powerful Argument” About the Meaning of Free Exercise: Congressional Power, “Facial” Review, and why Rosenkranz’ Subjects Theory Does Not Support Smith 1 n.*, 42 n.161 (2012) (unpublished manuscript) (on file with author), citing Tillman & Tillman's A Fragment on Shall and May.
[August 12, 2013]
Disciplines
Publication Date
May 15, 2012
Citation Information
Ephraim Unell, Not “The Most Powerful Argument” About the Meaning of Free Exercise: Congressional Power, “Facial” Review, and why Rosenkranz’ Subjects Theory Does Not Support Smith 1 n.*, 42 n.161 (2012) (unpublished manuscript) (on file with author), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2060613, also available at http://works.bepress.com/seth_barrett_tillman/368.