Other
BRIEF: Shahbazi v. TD Security: Defendant's Opposition Brief to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment -- Filed Jan. 7, 2011 -- in the Delaware Court of Chancery citing Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law
(2011)
Abstract
Defendant's Opposition Brief to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Kevin Shahbazi v. TD Security, LLC, No. 5628-VCL (Del. Ch. Jan. 7, 2011) (filed by Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP), Dkt. No. 90, 2011 WL 590871, 2011 DE Ch. Ct. Motions LEXIS 3, at *44, *48, is a brief which cites C. Stephen Bigler & Seth Barrett Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law, 63 Bus. Law. 1109 (2008).
This document was originally filed under seal (as the document itself indicates, but the seal has been lifted).
An extract from the brief is now posted.
[Feb. 23, 2011]
Disciplines
Publication Date
January 10, 2011
Citation Information
Defendant's Opposition Brief to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment at 26, 28, Kevin Shahbazi v. TD Security, LLC, No. 5628-VCL (Del. Ch. Jan. 7, 2011) (citing C. Stephen Bigler & Seth Barrett Tillman, Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law, 63 Bus. Law. 1109 (2008)) (filed by Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP) (formerly under seal), Dkt. No. 90, 2011 WL 590871, 2011 DE Ch. Ct. Motions LEXIS 3, at *44, *48, available at http://works.bepress.com/seth_barrett_tillman/216/.