Memorandum of Law -- Filed December 9, 2008 -- in the Delaware Court of Chancery citing Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law
Abstract
Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their Motion for Default Judgment, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs 12, Noe v. Kropf, 2008 WL 5202998, 2008 DE Ch. Ct. Motions LEXIS 36 (Del. Ch. Dec. 9, 2008) (No. 4050-CC) (filed by Greenberg Traurig, LLP) is a brief which cites Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law.
Chancellor William B. Chandler III ruled on Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment and on Intervenor's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs on January 15, 2009 (docketed February 2, 2009). Chandler's ruling appears on a transcript to a telephonic conference. Transaction ID#28954383. A copy appears below as a related file.
[March 18, 2009]
Suggested Citation
Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their Motion for Default Judgment, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs 12, Noe v. Kropf, 2008 WL 5202998, 2008 DE Ch. Ct. Motions LEXIS 36 (Del. Ch. Dec. 9, 2008) (No. 4050-CC) (citing C. Stephen Bigler & Seth Barrett Tillman, Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law, 63 Bus. Law. 1109-52 (2008)) (filed by Greenberg Traurig, LLP), available at http://works.bepress.com/seth_barrett_tillman/107/.
NoeKropf.Transcript.pdf