"BRIEF: Noe v. Kropf: Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law -- Filed December 9, 2008 -- in the Delaware Court of Chancery citing Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law" by Seth Barrett Tillman

Other

BRIEF: Noe v. Kropf: Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law -- Filed December 9, 2008 -- in the Delaware Court of Chancery citing Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law

(2008)

Seth Barrett Tillman

Download

Abstract

Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their Motion for Default Judgment, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs at 12, Noe v. Kropf (Del. Ch. Dec. 9, 2008) (No. 4050-CC) (citing C. Stephen Bigler & Seth Barrett Tillman, Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law, 63 Bus. Law. 1109 (2008)) (filed by Greenberg Traurig, LLP), 2008 WL 5202998, 2008 DE Ch. Ct. Motions LEXIS 36, at *18, available at http://works.bepress.com/seth_barrett_tillman/107/.

Chancellor William B. Chandler III ruled on Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment and on Intervenor's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs on January 15, 2009 (docketed February 2, 2009). Chandler's ruling appears on a transcript to a telephonic conference. Transaction ID#28954383. A copy appears below as a related file.

[July 20, 2010]

Disciplines

Publication Date

December 9, 2008

Citation Information

Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their Motion for Default Judgment, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs at 12, Noe v. Kropf (Del. Ch. Dec. 9, 2008) (No. 4050-CC) (citing C. Stephen Bigler & Seth Barrett Tillman, Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law, 63 Bus. Law. 1109 (2008)) (filed by Greenberg Traurig, LLP), 2008 WL 5202998, 2008 DE Ch. Ct. Motions LEXIS 36, at *18 available at http://works.bepress.com/seth_barrett_tillman/107/.