The German Constitutional Court Judgement on data retention: proportionality overrides unlimited surveillance (doesn't it ?)
Abstract
On 15 March 2006, the Data Retention Directive, demanding the retention of telecommunications data for a period of six months up to two years, was adopted. Since then, this seemingly straightforward directive has ‘generated’ quite an impressive number of court judgments. They range from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to the administrative (e.g. Germany and Bulgaria ) and constitutional courts (e.g. Romania ) of some Member-States. In particular, the judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court, delivered on 2 March 2010, has already caught the attention of several commentators, from civil society, lawyers, journalists and politicians (cf. infra). In the judgment, the Court annuls the German implementation laws of the Data Retention Directive. This paper has two main goals. On the one side, it aims at offering a first critical overview of this important judgment, highlighting some of the key features of the ruling and its main similarities and divergences with other similar judgments. On the other side, given the relevance of the issues at stake, it aims at contextualizing the judgment in the wider framework of European data processing and protection debates, assuming a critical posture on the increasing emphasis on proportionality as the “golden criterion” to assess and limit surveillance practices.
Suggested Citation
Katja de Vries, Rocco Bellanova, Paul De Hert, and Serge Gutwirth. "The German Constitutional Court Judgement on data retention: proportionality overrides unlimited surveillance (doesn't it ?)" Privacy and data protection : an element of choice (to be published). Ed. S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, P. De Hert & R. Leenes. Springer, 2011.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/serge_gutwirth/53
Download