Skip to main content
Article
Mapping Supreme Court Doctrine: Civil Pleading
7 Federal Courts Law Review 275 (2014)
  • Scott Dodson
  • Colin Starger, University of Baltimore
Abstract

This essay, adapted from the video presentation available at http://vimeo.com/89845875, graphically depicts the genealogy and evolution of federal civil pleading standards in U.S. Supreme Court opinions over time. We show that the standard narrative—of a decline in pleading liberality from Conley to Twombly to Iqbal—is complicated by both progenitors and progeny. We therefore offer a fuller picture of the doctrine of Rule 8 pleading that ought to be of use to judges and practitioners in federal court. We also hope to introduce a new visual format for academic scholarship that capitalizes on the virtues of narration, graphics, mapping, online accessibility, and electronic dissemination.

Keywords
  • Twombly,
  • Iqbal,
  • Twiqbal,
  • video article,
  • mapping,
  • Swierkiewicz,
  • Papasan,
  • Matrixx,
  • pleading,
  • Rule 8
Disciplines
Publication Date
2014
Publisher Statement
Originally published by the Federal Courts Law Review.
Citation Information
Scott Dodson & Colin Starger, Mapping Supreme Court Doctrine: Civil Pleading, 7 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 275 (2014)