<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Scott DeVito</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2010  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/scott_devito</link>
<description>Recent documents in Scott DeVito</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:31:59 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	







<item>
<title>Experimenting on Law Students: Why Imposing No Constraints on Educational Research Using Law Students as Guinea Pigs is a Bad Idea and Proposed Ethical Guidelines</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/scott_devito/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/scott_devito/1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:02:04 PST</pubDate>
<description>Under current federal regulations, law school faculty are permitted to engage in human research using students as subjects with little or no ethical oversite.  This freewheeling environment runs counter to well established ethical guidelines for human research and to law professors' heightened moral duties as members of the Bar and the legal academy.  In addition, it exposes students, law faculty, and the legal academy to risks arising out of the use of unregulated human experimentation in law schools.  This is inimical to morally good practice.  To remedy this ethical problem this article provides a set of guidelines for law professors who wish to ethically engage in empirical research using students as subjects.</description>

<author>Scott DeVito</author>


<category>Education Law</category>

<category>Legal Education</category>

<category>Legal Profession</category>

<category>Professional Ethics</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
