Skip to main content
Unpublished Paper
Working Toward a "Shared Authority" in the Discipline and Content of Public Hlstory: A Case Study
(1999)
  • Ruth E. Bryan, North Carolina State University
Abstract
This paper explores the meaning of “public history” using Michael Frisch’s concept of a “shared authority” (A Shared Authority, 1990) through a case study of the reviews of two edited and published oral histories, Outside the Magic Circle: The Autobiography of Virginia Foster Durr (ed. Hollinger F. Barnard, 1985) and All is Never Said: The Narrative of Odette Harper Hines (ed. Judith Rollins, 1995). The result is that although history can be produced by historians with the public and about the public, public history cannot be truly an authoritative history (making explicit connections between facts, narrative, and the purpose of that narrative for the present) without conveying to the public an accurate perception of where the authority for the creation of history rests.
Keywords
  • history,
  • oral history,
  • shared authority,
  • Michael Frisch,
  • Virginia Foster Durr,
  • Odette Harper Hines,
  • authorship,
  • authority
Publication Date
1999
Comments
A paper for Historical Writing class, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Citation Information
Ruth E. Bryan. "Working Toward a "Shared Authority" in the Discipline and Content of Public Hlstory: A Case Study" (1999)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ruthbryan/11/