<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Robert I. Field</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2011  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field</link>
<description>Recent documents in Robert I. Field</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:31:53 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Government as the Crucible for Free Market Health Care: Regulation, Reimbursement, and Reform</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/16</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/16</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:20:39 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Political debates over economic policy commonly pit the virtues of the free market against those of government oversight. Regulatory policy then becomes an ongoing contest between the public and private sectors, infusing policy debates with a sense that it is necessary to choose between them. On closer examination, this duality is false. On a fundamental level, free-market entrepreneurs and government regulators are not opponents, but are, on the contrary, partners in a common enterprise. Across a range of major industries, one party could not exist without the other.</p>
<p>In no industry is this interplay more important than in health care. A series of government programs, most initiated during the latter half of the twentieth century, literally created the health care system as it exists in the United States today. Hospitals grew to their present size and technological complexity because of funding provided by the Hill-Burton Act and Medicare. Medicare also funds physician training, as well as reimbursement for many physician-provided services. Pharmaceutical manufacturers rely on the National Institutes of Health to support basic biomedical research that leads to the development of new drugs. A huge tax subsidy for employer-sponsored coverage finances, in large part, the health insurance industry. Without these programs, none of these health care industry segments could have approached its present size or vitality. To ignore this dynamic is to ignore the true nature of American health care and to fundamentally misunderstand the opportunities for reform.</p>
<p>The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) continues and extends this paradigm. It will expand coverage in large part by facilitating broader demand for individual policies, which will revitalize private insurance markets. It will also extend Medicaid, a program that in most states is administered by private managed care plans, to millions more beneficiaries. Far from representing a government takeover or novel incursion into the health care system, PPACA extends the underlying arrangement that has built and sustains the structure of American health care as it exists today. In the American health care system, private innovation and government intervention represent not opposing forces, but rather partners in a common enterprise.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Quality in the Physician-Patient Relationship: Legal Trends as Facilitators of Business Trends</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/15</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/15</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:15:09 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>New Ethical Relationships Under Health Care&apos;s New Structure: The Need for a New Paradigm</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/14</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/14</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:13:38 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Can Health Systems Heal Themselves?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/13</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/13</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:12:12 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Financial Impact of Over-the-Counter Availability of Oral Contraceptive Pills</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/12</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:07:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The oral contraceptive pill has been safely and effectively used for over 40 years. It seems reasonable to ask whether the pill should be made available over-the-counter (OTC) without a physician's prescription. If so, what will be the subsequent change in cost due to OTC pill availability? A cost-effectiveness model was adapted and modified to estimate the current contraceptive methods' cost and OTC pill availability cost. The possible changes from other contraceptive methods to the use of a potential OTC pill were assumed in this study. Using a predictive model, it was found that in the United States alone, nearly $13 billion could be saved annually if the oral contraceptive pill was available OTC. Given proven safety and effectiveness, the potential utilization and the enormous annual societal savings of an OTC oral contraceptive pill, one could conclude that it would be a reasonable public policy decision to make the lowdose pill available over the counter.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mingfang Zhu et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Toward a Policy Agenda on Medical Research Funding</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/11</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:01:33 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>What Should Medicare Look Like in 2010?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/10</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:58:08 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>What Will Medicaid Look Like in 2010?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/9</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:50:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Future of Public Health: What Will It Take to Keep Americans Healthy and Safe?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/8</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:49:18 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Regulation of Homeopathic Drug Products</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/7</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:47:07 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>John P. Borneman et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Health Savings Accounts</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/6</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:44:31 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Despite the increasing “consumer-like” role of patients in choosing health savings accounts (HSAs), do these plans nonetheless leave those who are most sick and vulnerable out in the cold? And what will be the impact of HSAs on Medicare?</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>How Can We Improve Drug Safety?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/5</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:42:08 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Beyond Drug Coverage: The Cumulative Effect of Privatization Reforms in the Medicare Modernization Act</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/4</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:40:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A Taxonomy of American Health Care Regulation: Implications for Health Reform</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/2</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:34:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A Proposed Ethical Framework for Vaccine Mandates: Competing Values and the Case of HPV</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/robert_field/1</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:18:49 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Debates over vaccine mandates raise intense emotions, as reflected in the current controversy over whether to mandate the vaccine against human papilloma virus (HPV), the virus that can cause cervical cancer. Public health ethics so far has failed to facilitate meaningful dialogue between the opposing sides. When stripped of its emotional charge, the debate can be framed as a contest between competing ethical values. This framework can be conceptualized graphically as a conflict between autonomy on the one hand, which militates against government intrusion, and beneficence, utilitarianism, justice, and nonmaleficence on the other, which may lend support to intervention. When applied to the HPV vaccine, this framework would support a mandate based on utilitarianism, if certain conditions are met and if herd immunity is a realistic objective.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert I. Field et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>

