Skip to main content
Presentation
Defects In The Economic Impact Analysis Provided By The USPTO For Its New Claims and Continuation Rules. Appendix E to Amicus Curiae Brief
Tafas/GSK v. Dudas et al., U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. Case No. 1:07-cv-846, Doc. 258-5, January 10, (2008)
  • Ron D Katznelson
Keywords
  • Patent Continuation,
  • RCE,
  • CIP,
  • Divisional application,
  • Claims,
  • patenting trends,
  • Regulatory Flexibility Act,
  • small business entities,
  • regulations
Publication Date
January 10, 2008
Citation Information
Ron D Katznelson. "Defects In The Economic Impact Analysis Provided By The USPTO For Its New Claims and Continuation Rules. Appendix E to Amicus Curiae Brief" Tafas/GSK v. Dudas et al., U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. Case No. 1:07-cv-846, Doc. 258-5, January 10, (2008)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/rkatznelson/16/