Presentation
Defects In The Economic Impact Analysis Provided By The USPTO For Its New Claims and Continuation Rules. Appendix E to Amicus Curiae Brief
Tafas/GSK v. Dudas et al., U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. Case No. 1:07-cv-846, Doc. 258-5, January 10,
(2008)
Keywords
- Patent Continuation,
- RCE,
- CIP,
- Divisional application,
- Claims,
- patenting trends,
- Regulatory Flexibility Act,
- small business entities,
- regulations
Disciplines
Publication Date
January 10, 2008
Citation Information
Ron D Katznelson. "Defects In The Economic Impact Analysis Provided By The USPTO For Its New Claims and Continuation Rules. Appendix E to Amicus Curiae Brief" Tafas/GSK v. Dudas et al., U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. Case No. 1:07-cv-846, Doc. 258-5, January 10, (2008) Available at: http://works.bepress.com/rkatznelson/16/